সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Joinder of Charges
Section 235-The various acts were done in pursuance of a particular end in view and they were connected together by proximity of time, unity of purpose and continuity of action and those acts formed parts of the same transaction within the meaning of section 235, CrPC. (Per Siddiqur Rahman Miah J: agreeing). Zahed Hossain vs State 61 DLR 386.
Sections 235 and 239-The provisions of section 235 and 239 of the Code vest a discretion with the Court to try offences of the kinds indi- cated therein jointly in the circumstances men- tioned, but there is nothing in them to indicate that the Court is bound to try such offences or persons together. (Per Siddiqur Rahman Miah J: agree- ing). Zahed Hossain (Md) vs State 61 DLR 386.
Sections 235-237-Where from the facts of the case it is not clear which of the several offen- ces has been committed, the accused may be charged with having committed all or any of such offences and he may be convicted of the offence which he is shown to have committed, although he was not charged with it. Parveen vs State 51 DLR 473.
Sections 235-237 and 403-When facts of the case are such that it is doubtful which of the several offences has been committed the accused may be charged with having committed all or any of such offences; and after trial for one such offence the accused may be convicted for the other offence even though he was not charged thereof In the instant case "robbery" and "un- authorised possession of fire arms" are not offences of the same nature contemplated in sec- tions 236 and 237 (1) CrPC, but these are two distinct offences for which a person may be charged for each of them as provided in section 235(1) CrPC. Arfan Ali vs State 42 DLR (AD) 22.
Sections 235 and 239 Section 235 empo- wers trial of a person for more offences than one if those are committed in the same transaction but section 239 provides for persons accused of diffe- rent offences committed in the course of the same transaction. State vs Lieutenant Colonel Syed Farook Rahman 53 DLR 287.
Sections 235 and 239-Whether a series of acts are so connected as to form the same transac- tion is purely a question of fact depending on proximity of time and place, continuity of action and unity of purpose and design. A comprehensive formuia of universal application cannot be framed regarding the question whether two or more acts constitute the same transaction. State vs Md Abu Taher 56 DLR 556.
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
