সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Relationship of Master and Servant
The relief prayed by the plaintiff in this suit is vague and unspecified. It is neither a suit for declaration nor for mandatory in junction. Rupali Bank being a private bank the relationship between the bank and the plaintiff is governed by the rule of master and servant (vide 11 DLR (SC) 365). Thus, plaintiff has no legal character and, as such, the suit is not maintainable. [Shafique Ullah (Md) vs Rupali Bank Ltd (Civil) 546, 59 DLR 2007]
Bars granting of mandatory injunction agaisnt breach of contract
Rupali Bank after denationalisation and its incorporation under the Companies Act, 1994 has become a private Bank and as such the relationship between its employer and employee is that of master and servant. As in a suit for declaration against dismissal from service no mandatory injunction can be granted, such suit is not maintainable. An employer can not be compelled to retain its employee whom it is not willing to retain. However the plaintiff may get compensation as per service regulation. [Jahiniddin (Md.) Vs. Rupali Bank Ltd. and others 13 MLR (2008) 47-52]
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
