সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Partisan evidence is no doubt suspect, but cannot be discarded without finding any inherent infirmity and/or contradictions therein making the same unworthy of credence. In the context of prevailing deteriorating law and order situation in the society where open threat is given to the witnesses not to depose in support of the prosecution case the difficulty of the prosecution to bring independent witnesses, and the rising tendency of witnesses giving testimony in the Court to favour the accused giving different versions of the occurrence from the one made to the investigation officer at the time of investigation, for the above reasons, should be considered before finding fault with the prosecution for non-production of independent witnesses and relying on the evidence of the witnesses declared hostile by the prosecution without properly evaluating whatever evidence is available on record with a critical eye in the context of the respective cases of the parties. Dulal Miah @ Dulal @ Nurun Nabi vs Ruhul Amin and others 50 DLR 618 Section 3— Recognition by torch and hurricane at dead of night is doubtful. Abu Bakker and others vs State 49 DLR 480.
A partisan witness is no doubt a suspect, but he cannot be discarded without finding any inherent infirmity and/or contradictions in the evidence making the same unworthy of credence. Dulal Miah alias Dulal alias NurunNabi Vs Ruhul Amin and others, 18BLD (HCD)485
When enmity is admitted between the parties and the witnesses and the whole prosecution case depends on a dying declaration, the Court as a matter of caution has to insist on corroboration of the prosecution case by independent evidence. Md. AbulKashem Vs. The State, 15BLD (HCD)205 Ref: 42 DLR (AD) 200-Cited
In a case where there is bitter enmity between the parties, the rule of prudence re- quires that there must be some sort of corroboration of the evidence of interested wit- nesses in order to find the accused guilty of the charged with. Fazlul Haq Sikder Vs. The State, ISBLD (HCD)364
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
