সার্চ ইন্টারফেসে আপনাকে স্বাগতম

আপনি এখানে আপনার কাঙ্ক্ষিত তথ্য সহজে খুঁজে পেতে পারেন। নির্দিষ্ট শব্দ বা সংখ্যা লিখে সার্চ করুন। এরপর ডান দিকের আপ এন্ড ডাউন আইকনে ক্লিক করে উপরে নিচে যান।

হুবহু মিল
কিছুটা মিল

Locus Standi in Writ of Quo Warranto | Case Reference

লিগ্যাল ভয়েস


সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।


Locus Standi
On perusal of the aforesaid provision it appears that the key words are "any person" who can make an application under Article 102(2)(b)(ii) of the Constitution. This question as to who is/are the "any person" that has been clarified by this Division in the case of Bangladesh ve Md Aftabuddin reported in 15 BLC (AD) 25 wherein it has been held "writ petition before the High Court Division being one under Article 102(2)(b)(ii) of the Constitution does not require that the applicant for a writ of quo warranto must be an aggrieved party. Any person can maintain such an application without showing any violation of his legal right." Again, in the case of National Board of Revenue vs. Abu Saeed Khan reported in 18 BLC (AD) 116 this Division has spelt out who can come forward as a public interest litigant. Therein this Division has set fourteen parameters within which the High Court Division should or should not extend its discretionary jurisdiction in entertaining a Public Interest Litigation including that if it is to protect the basic human rights of the disadvantaged citizens who are unable to reach the Court due to illiteracy or monetary helplessness. In the present case a person has been admitted/enrolled as an advocate, who was convicted for an offence involving moral turpitude, before elapsing/expiry of the period fixed in the Rules. Thus a disqualified person being enrolled as an advocate the clients, mostly illiterate and financially helpless, would not get appropriate legal assistance from him and their basic human rights would not be protected by him. So, the writ petitioner has locus standi to file the writ petition challenging his enrollment as an advocate as a public interest litigant in a writ of quo warranto under Article 102(2)(b)(ii) of the Constitution. [73 DLR (AD) (2021) 109]

Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."

Post a Comment

Join the conversation