সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Evaluation of Evidence
There cannot be any bar for a person to witness an occurrence and give evidence merely because the accused has brought the case against that person-His evidence is to be tested, scrutinized and assessed along with all other evidence and circumstances. Shah Alam vs State 42 DLR (AD) 31.
Examination and cross-examination of witnesses-Appreciation of evidence
The proper procedure for appreciation of the evidence is to evaluate the evidence of a witness in its entirety and not to bank on a particular portion of it. The evidence of a witness in his cross-examination is as good as that of his examination-in-chief and it demands due attention of the Court. Any finding based on the examination-in-chief of a witness ignoring his cross-examination must be held to be no proper appreciation of evidence in the eye of law Tamal Biswas Vs. The State, 20BLD (HCD)322
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
