সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Understanding of document-The party taking advantage under the document must show to the Court that the deed was explained to and understood by the executant and she adopted it with full knowledge and comprehension. The fact whether independent advice was available to a pardanashin lady at the time when she entered into a transaction can be taken into consideration in order to determine whether she thoroughly comprehend and deliberately of her own free will, carried out the transaction. If it is found that the document was conceived and executed by her free will, it shall be upheld. PLD 1985 Karachi 431.
However, if subsequently the executant makes declaration that he nor she had not understood what he or she was doing, that by itself is not conclusive.must be a question whether, having regard to the proved personality of the executant, the nature of the transaction, the circumstances under which it was executed and the whole history of the parties, it was reasonably proved that the document was the free and intelligent act of the executant or not. If the answer was in the affirmative, the person relying on the document had discharged the onus.resting upon him. PLD 1985 Karachi 431 (DB).
Where the ladies who executed a document were illiterate. They Knew only how to sign but that too in Gujrati. The burden lay heavily on the appellant-Bank to prove that not only the ladies executed the documents in question but also fully understood their contents. PLD 1985 Karachi 431.
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
