সতর্কীকরণ! কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত অধিকাংশ নজীর বিভিন্ন বই ও ওয়েবসাইট থেকে সংগ্রহ করা হয়েছে। এই সকল নজীর এর সঠিকতার বিষয়ে কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইট কোন নিশ্চয়তা প্রদান করে না। কেস রেফারেন্স ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত নজীর এর উপর নির্ভর এর আগে সংশ্লিষ্ট নজীরটির রেফারেন্স মিলিয়ে নেওয়ার অনুরোধ করা হচ্ছে।
Doctrine of Proportionality
Whether the Appellate Tribunal was wrong in applying the doctrine of proportionality: The AAT while observing "the order dismissal from service has been unreasonably severe in consideration of the nature of the guilt and the said order is liable to be modified" has not assigned any reason in support of the said observation nor has held that the" punishment imposed was illegal or vitiated by procedural impropriety, rather the AAT had held that "there has been no procedural defect in the departmental proceeding". The AAT has also not recorded any finding as to irrationality of the punishment awarded nor it has held that the decision of the appellant No.1 is one which no sensible person who weighed the pros and cons could have arrived at and that there is no finding, based on material,4that_ the punishment awarded was in 'outrageous' defiance of logic; —Held In our view the AAT was in serious error in modifying the order of dismissal in the manner as stated hereinbefore upon importing the concept of proportionality which has no application in instant case in the background of the decision reported in 46 DLR (AD) 85 and further while the said concept is non- existent in the field of administration of justice in Bangladesh. Agrani Bank Vs. Khandaker Badrudduza 14 BLT (AD)184
Info!
"Please note that while every effort has been made to provide accurate case references, there may be some unintentional errors. We encourage users to verify the information from official sources for complete accuracy."
