Place of occurrence
The
High Court Division confused the pathway and the vacant land as two distinct
and different places whereas the pathway has been shown in the sketch map adjacent
to the place of occurrence and the place of occurrence is on the pathway and
the vacant land by the side of the pathway. Therefore, there was no shifting of
the place of occurrence as misunderstood by the High Court Division only because
pathway has been depicted in the sketch map as 'K' and the place of occurrence
as 'A'. State vs Anowar Hossain Pinto 61 DLR (AD) 108.
