Ain Sringkhola Bignokari Aparadh (Druta Bichar) Ain [X1 of 2002]
Section 4(1)- From the evidence discussed above it is found that the accused along with his associates created terror and panic in the place of occurrence and assaulted the nephew of the infor- mant victim Shibli Sadik mercilessly in order to get illegal subscription from them. These acti- vities of the accused-petitioners clearly fall under definition of Ain Sringkhola Bignokari Aparadh. Montu vs State 57 DLR 504.
Section 42-When factum of recovery has not been proved by independent and disinterested witness, it is unsafe to find guilt of the accused under section 4(1) of the Ain. Dr Md Rahmat Ali vs State 63 DLR 452.
