Bangladesh Bank Staff Regulations, 2003 | Case Reference

Bangladesh Bank Staff Regulations, 2003

Regulation 13(ii)- Review by по means is a re-hearing of the appeal. The Appellate Division is of the view that in all these civil review petitions the grounds urged by the petitioners are nothing but the grounds taken into consideration and repelled in the leave Petitions. It is therefore not permissible to embark upon a reiteration of the same contentions as were advanced at the time of hearing of the leave petitions.

The Appellate Division observed that in these civil review petitions the Appellate Division does not find any substance in the submissions of Mr. Rafique-ul-Huq, the learned Advocate for the petitioners rather the Appellate Division finds substance in the submissions of Mr. Shamim Khaled Ahmed, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondents to the effect that the grounds taken in the review petitions are in real terms the same grounds which were already considered and repelled in the judgment and order passed by this Division in the above leave petitions. The Appellate Division consistently held that review by no means is a re-hearing of the appeal. The Appellate Division is, therefore, of the view that in all these civil review petitions the grounds urged by the petitioners are nothing but the grounds taken into consideration and repelled in the leave Petitions. It is therefore not permissible to em- bark upon a reiteration of the same contentions as were advanced at the time of hearing of the leave petitions. From the above discussions and findings the Appellate Division is of the opinion that there is no error apparent on the face of the record to interfere in the impugned judgment and order passed by this Division in the above leave petitions. There is no legal ground in these civil review petitions for review of the impugned judgment and order passed by this Division in the civil petitions for leave to appeal. Accordingly, all these civil review petitions are dismissed. Md. Abdul Mazid Sarker and others -Vs.- Bangladesh and others (Civil) 15 ALR (AD)49-54