সার্চ ইন্টারফেসে আপনাকে স্বাগতম

আপনি এখানে আপনার কাঙ্ক্ষিত তথ্য সহজে খুঁজে পেতে পারেন। নির্দিষ্ট শব্দ বা সংখ্যা লিখে সার্চ করুন। এরপর ডান দিকের আপ এন্ড ডাউন আইকনে ক্লিক করে উপরে নিচে যান।

হুবহু মিল
কিছুটা মিল

Search and seizure | Case Reference

লিগ্যাল ভয়েস

Search and seizure

Search and seizure without strictly following the provisions of law cannot be held to be legal-Cr.P.C. Ss. 102 and 103 Md. Moklesur Rahman and another Vs.. The State, 14BLD(HCD)126

Ref: 26DLR297

 

Search and Seizure

When the pipe guns in question were re- covered from a sugarcane field and the place was accessible to the public and the 3 seizure list witnesses did not prove the recovery of the fire arms from the possession of the accused, his exclusive possession of the fire arms becomes doubtful-Cr.P.C. 103

Golam Mostafa (Bara) Vs. The State, 14 BLD (HCD)317 Ref: 21 D.L.R. 684; 44 DLR159 Cited

 

Search and seizure

In conducting search for recovery of contraband phensidil syrups the conducting officer is required to comply with the provisions of section 103 Cr.P.C. Md. Faruque Hossain and 2 others Vs. The State, 15BLD (HCD) 162

 

Search and seizure

The provisions relating to search and seizure provided in subsections (1) and (2) of section 103 Cr.P.C. are mandatory. Any search and seizure without strictly complying with the aforesaid provisions of law is illegal. Habibur Rahman alias Jane Alam Vs. The State, 15BLD(HCD) 129

 

Search and Seizure

The police must follow the laws and rules relating to search and seizure. Non- compliance of the mandatory provision of section 103 Cr.P.C. and Regulation No. 280 of the Police Regulations makes search and seizure illegal. Md. Zulfiqure Ali alias Kazal Vs. The State, 15BLD (HCD) 570

 

Search and seizure

When the accused admits that he has arms in his possession and arms are actually recov- ered at his instance, provisions of Sections 103 and 165 Cr.P.C. are of little relevance. Kamruzzaman alias Babul Sikdar Vs. The State, 15BLD(HCD) 486

 

Search Warrant

Section 100 of Cr.P.C empowers a Mag- istrate to issue search warrant for the recovery of the child who has been kidnapped and wrongfully confined. A direction issued by a Magistrate to the same effect is not in confir- mity with the provision of section 100 Cr.P.C. Dr. G.M. EnamulHoque Vs. Mosam- mat Rafia Begum and another, 13 BLD (HCD)483

 

Search Warrant

The provisions of section 103 Cr.P.C. are designed to create a safeguard against possi- ble chicanery and concoction on the part of the Investigating Officer and it is obligatory on the officer about to execute a search war- rant to call on and get two or more respectable inhabitants of the locality to witness the search to ensure that the search is conducted honestly-Cr.P.CS.103

Subodh Ranjan and others Vs. The State, 13 BLD(HCD)430 Ref: PLD 1979 (Lahore) 279; 26 DLR 297; PLD 1975 (SC) 607, 609-Cited

 

Seizure

Non-seizure of the torch light-Non- seizure by the Investigating Officer of the torch light by which the witnesses allegedly recognised the accused renders the prosecution case unacceptable Abdul Latif alias Budu and others Vs. The State, 14BLD (HCD) 94

 

Seizure

Under Section 26 of the Arms Act only the Government and not the District Magis- trate is empowered to seize arms of any per- son and detain the same for such time as it thinks necessary for the public safety. Md. Mokbul Hossain Santu Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others, 18BLD (HCD) 509


Post a Comment

Join the conversation