সার্চ ইন্টারফেসে আপনাকে স্বাগতম

আপনি এখানে আপনার কাঙ্ক্ষিত তথ্য সহজে খুঁজে পেতে পারেন। নির্দিষ্ট শব্দ বা সংখ্যা লিখে সার্চ করুন। এরপর ডান দিকের আপ এন্ড ডাউন আইকনে ক্লিক করে উপরে নিচে যান।

হুবহু মিল
কিছুটা মিল

Maintenance | Case Reference

লিগ্যাল ভয়েস

Maintenance

The Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 has not ousted the jurisdiction of a Magistrate to exercise power under section 488 Cr.P.C. The provision of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 are applicable not only to the Muslim Community but also to other communities as well. Meher Negar Vs. Md. Mojibur Rah- man, 14 BLD (HCD) 467 Ref: 42DLR(HCD)450; PLD 1969(SC) 187, SCMR(Vol. IV) 1971 Page 150: 14 BLD (HCD) 415 Cited

 

Maintenance

Section 5 of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 gives exclusive jurisdiction to the Family Court to try any suit for maintenance. An application for maintenance under section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not a suit and as such the provisions of the Family Courts have not taken away the power of the Magistrate to order for maintenance under Section 488 Cr.P.C. Zinnatan Nessa Vs. Md. Kaloo Mia, 15BLD(HCD) 545 Ref: 14 BLD 467- 47 DLR 18-Cited

 

Maintenance

Section 3 of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 envisages that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law the provisions of this Ordinance shall apply to cases filed under this Ordinance.

A relief provided in an Act cannot be taken away by implication simply because similar relief has been provided in a subsequent Act without repealing the provision for relief in the previous Act. The power of the Magistrate to act under section 488 Cr.P.C. has not been taken away by promulgation of the Family Courts Ordinance. Rezaul Karim Vs. Rashida Begum and another, 16BLD(HCD)181 Ref: 47DLR 18: 1971 SCMR 150; PLD 1969 (SC) 187; 42 DLR 450-Cited

 

Maintenance

The combined effect of the provisions of sections 3, 4, 5 and 27 of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 is that the jurisdiction of the Magistrates in dealing with matters contained in section 488 of the Code is ousted after the coming into operation of the Family Courts Ordinance, 1985 Pachan Rissi Das Vs. Khuku Rani Dasi and others, 17BLD(HCD) 563 Ref: AIR 1961 (SC) 1152: 14BLD415; 14BLD413: 47 DLR18; 21DLR (1969)123; PLD 1984 (SC) 95: PLD 1984 (SC) 95; PLD 1971 (Karachi) 887; 42 DLR 450; PLD 1969 (SC)187-Cited


Post a Comment

Join the conversation