BENGAL
POLICE REGULATION, 1943
Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943
Regulation 68- A perusal of regulation 68 makes it clear that the diary should contain full unabridged statement of persons examined by the police so as to give the Magistrate a satisfactory and complete source of information which would enable him to decide whether or not the accused person should be detained in custody. Section 167(1) requires that copies of entries of the diary should be sent to the Magistrate with the object to prevent any abuse of power by the police officer. .......Ministry of Law, Justice & Parl. Afrs. =VS-BLAST, [3 LM (AD) 274]
Regulation 68(b)- It has been said in PRB No.68(b) that a person not being a Police-Officer can also go through the case diary on being empowered by the Superintendent of Police Every Police Officer shall keep his case-diary in proper care and custody and shall consider it a very secret and confidential document till final disposal of an appeal or a revision pending before Courts...... Ministry of Law, Justice & Parl. Afrs. =VS BLAST, [3 LM (AD) 274]
Regulation No.263-A case diary main- tained by the Police cannot be treated as subs- tantive evidence but it may be used for the purpose of ascertaining the truth or otherwise of the evidence appearing in the case. Abdus Sukur Mia vs State 48 DLR 228.
Regulation 612-Inquiry and the investigation as envisaged in regulations 612(b) l(i)(vi), 612(b)11(i) and 612(b) 111 can, in no way, be related to a case which is being investigated into by an investi- gation agency. The regulations of the PRB cannot override the provisions of the Code. State vs Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, 67 DLR (AD) 271
Regulation No. 856, 859
The tribunal cannot grant gratuitous relief and if such a relief is granted the same should be construed as relief granted in excess of jurisdiction. The Administrative Tribunal Act has not provided for any such authority to the Tribunal to give such a relief as has been given to the authority in the present case before us. Quazi Nazrul Islam Vs. Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation 45 DLR (AD) 106. Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka & Md. Anwarul Islam vs BRSMH (Mahmudul Amin Choudhury CJ) (Civil) IADC 390
Rule 861- Black Mark- The petitioner for submitting false investigation report with intent to save the accused persons for illegal gain. the petitioner was charged under Rule 861 of the Police Regulations, Bengal (P.R.B.) and after completing a departmental proceeding, major penalty of "Black Mark" was imposed on 17. 08.2009. .....Govt. of Bangladesh & others =VS= Ranjit Krishna Mazumder, [1 LM (AD) 370]
Police Regulations of Bengal Case diary Learned Attorney General submits that the High Court Division has not considered the Police Regulations of Bengal while making observations relating to case diary and submits that under the Police Regulations of Bengal the court or any other person is not authorized to look into the case diary in view of G.O. No.P.8C-5/60(III) 34PI, dated 16th January, 1961....... Ministry of Law, Justice & Parl. Afrs. VS BLAST, [3 LM (AD) 274]
